Join Shelby Forums Today

can anybody ID these parts?

Discussion in '1965-1970 Shelby Mustang GT350 & GT500' started by 1967GT350, Aug 22, 2007.

  1. 1967GT350

    1967GT350 Member

    Posts:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2006
    Hi
    First let me say that I have cut & pasted this web listing from the NVSAAC site, for which I thank them. I know that they also frequent this site, so if it's an issue please let me know.

    http://www.nvsaac.com/photogallery/images/1967/350/67_350_165_d.jpg

    What I'm looking for is the Shelby installed grey porcelain junction block on the passenger side fender panel, next to the solenoid. I misplaced the one from my car years ago and can't find it. would appear to come on the earlier 1967 GT350's.

    I am also missing the round black rubber relay which is normally mounted just in front of and near the top of the passenger side rad support. If memory serves, I believe it was a "Lucas" part.

    I have seen these parts on cars other than my own, early production seems to be a common denominator.

    Like many original "Shelby" items I'm sure these are originally from other applications, adapted to the needs of the times.

    Any help or leads would be appreciated.

    Thanks....Mark
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2007
  2. ELJ1st500

    ELJ1st500 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    61
    Posts:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Location:
    Colorado
    Mark,

    I believe that the "Junction Block" used on the early '67s is a piece of aircraft terminal strip. I may be able to get a new piece that is extremely close to the original piece. Let me know if you are interested and we can talk about it.

    Thanks,
    Eric
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2007
  3. mherman2

    mherman2 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    565
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2005
  4. 1967GT350

    1967GT350 Member

    Posts:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2006
    Thanks for the replies.

    First, "ELJ", I've got to say that I saw what I think was your car in one of the recent Mustang mags. What a great story! I have to say that when I started to restore my car MANY years ago ( OK, family life kinda got in the way) I had hoped to enjoy it as a part time driver. Now, thanks to the escalated values, you obviously would have to be very concerned every time you take it out. I commend you for driving such a piece of history.
    I may be interested in the aircraft style isolator which you mentioned. I have an NOS isolator for a 1970ish car that would work but it would knaw at me that it's not what the car came with. Is it possible to post or PM a pic of the part you mentioned?

    Also MHERMAN2, the car does not have air conditioning. I wish I could remember, but does the relay maybe have something to do with the centre mounted headlights? I remember seeing car #0001 and it has the same part on it.

    Thanks again...Mark
     
  5. ELJ1st500

    ELJ1st500 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    61
    Posts:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Location:
    Colorado
    Mark,

    Yes, that is my car that you saw in Mustangs and Fords. Thanks for the compliments on the story. Thanks for the appreciation/compliment on my driving the car. Getting to drive the car is the best part of owning it. My wife and I drove it to a car show this past Saturday; about a 45 mile round trip. I had at least half a dozen people at the show ask where my trailer was parked. When I told them that I drove the car to the show, they said I was insane. I just laughed and asked, "why own it if you are not going to fully enjoy it?"

    When I get home tonight I will take a picture or two of the junction block(s) and post them for you to see.

    Thanks,
    Eric
     
  6. ELJ1st500

    ELJ1st500 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    61
    Posts:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Location:
    Colorado
    Mark,

    Here are some pictures for you.

    The first picture is of my broken original junction block.
    The second picture is of the new junction block.
    The third picture is of the new junction block installed in my car.

    I believe that the new junction block is virtually indistinguishable from the original junction block.

    Let me know what you think.

    Eric
     

    Attached Files:

  7. patty.dilabio

    patty.dilabio Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    327
    Likes Received:
    5
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Hi folks! The junction block on the early cars is aluminium colored and was only on early cars.Later build used an off the shelf terminal block from a truck & lincoln and has a C5VB-14448-A part number.It is a brown bakelite material,and is larger than the early type(longer).The other part you have described is not makeing much sense.Luckily Shelby was not useing any lucas parts on 67 Shelbys.They had enough trouble with Lucas in the early years with Cobra Production.Please let us know what wires lead to it,so we can figure out what it is used for.
    Thanks P.D.
     
  8. 1967GT350

    1967GT350 Member

    Posts:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2006
    Thanks Eric.

    You're right, the piece looks great. If you could please let me know if you have any for sale or where I may find a couple. If you don't have any yourself I could venture to the Boeing surplus store in Seattle and see what they may have.

    As for the relay here's a picture from at least 20 years ago before I took the car apart. I can tell you that for sure it was there in the early 1970's when I got the car, as well I've seen it on a couple of other early 67's.


    Thanks again....Mark

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2007
  9. ELJ1st500

    ELJ1st500 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    61
    Posts:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Location:
    Colorado
    Mark,

    I have sent you a Personal Message.

    Thanks,
    Eric
     
  10. Snakepit

    Snakepit Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    843
    Likes Received:
    12
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2005
    Location:
    Central Calif

    PD I've had a fair number of these (think there is still two or three in the shop) none have been brown but instead black plastic/bakeolite

    JEff
     
  11. Bob Gaines

    Bob Gaines Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,146
    Likes Received:
    37
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2006
    The early 2 ear terminal block is battleship gray in color .It was the hardest part to find for 0001. I had to buy 0008 to get one. I hope Eric has installed the wafer thin reddish brown resin circuit board insulater under the junction block ,the insulater was installed at Shelby to insulate the bottom of the metal stud from the metal of the apron it is screwed to, without it you are risking a catostrophic electrical fire caused by the full amphereage of the electrical system shorting out against the metal of the apron. The round relay in the picture is a added on auto parts store part probably to activate the horns because of a ill working steering wheel horn button. Hope this helps. Bob
     
  12. ELJ1st500

    ELJ1st500 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    61
    Posts:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Location:
    Colorado
    Bob,

    Great to hear from you on the forum. We can all benefit from your expertise.

    Well, you made me go out to the garage and compare the original broken junction block with the one that is currently on my car.

    The back side of the stud/terminal on the original piece is slightly recessed in the insulating material; but it is indeed exposed - not covered. I do not remember the "insulating wafer" that you describe being on the backside of the block when I took it off the car years ago. Maybe I got lucky that there had not been a problem........

    The insulating base on the junction block that is now on my car is slightly thicker than the original. This is because the back side of the stud/terminal is enclosed in the insulating material. So, there is no need for the "insulating wafer" that you describe. It might not be original, but visually it is extremely accurate/close, performs the same function, and is in fact safer. It even has the band saw blade marks on each end just like the original piece.

    Thanks,
    Eric
     
  13. roddster

    roddster Well-Known Member

    Age:
    72
    Posts:
    825
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Location:
    Lansing, the one in Illinois
    I just wanted to point out that the bolt in this junction block is unplated natural copper. And as to magnify the difficulty of finding that, it's fine threaded. Washers used were natural copper also. (#0036)
     
  14. markboss

    markboss Well-Known Member

    Age:
    67
    Posts:
    134
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    The junction block should have a resin wafer between the block and the inner fender, and from the far right picture looks installed upside down...


    Mark
     
  15. ELJ1st500

    ELJ1st500 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    61
    Posts:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Location:
    Colorado
    MarkBoss,

    Your comment about the orientation of the junction block on my car is incorrect. The junction block is installed in the correct orientation on my car. This can be verified by looking at the engine compartment pictures of my car in the February 1967 issue of Road and Track and the March 1967 issue of Sports Car Graphic.

    Thanks,
    Eric
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2007
  16. 1967GT350

    1967GT350 Member

    Posts:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2006
    Hi

    Let me start by saying how much I appreciate the input and expertise with what could have seemed like an "insignificant" little part.

    I am in the process of finally (hopefully) getting some paint back on the car this fall. It has been stripped and on a rotisserie for close to 20 years while my family grew up, but now it's "my turn".

    The part which Eric has found appears to be 99% correct which is perfect to me, and I am greatfull for his help. I had typed a rant about how 60's cars were far from perfect to start with, but that's for another day. All I am hoping for is to once again get behind the wheel, drive, & enjoy the car. (right, Eric?)

    Thanks again....Mark
     
  17. ELJ1st500

    ELJ1st500 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    61
    Posts:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Location:
    Colorado
    Mark,

    Thanks for the compliments and support. I appreciate it and I wish you the best of luck in getting your car completed and back on the road. Appreciating these cars for their original purpose TO BE DRIVEN is what it is all about in my book. I do not put a ton of miles on it, but it does get driven during nice weather. Yes, I do show my car. Is it a concourse correct perfectly restored museum piece? No, it is not. But I tell you what; it cleans up and "shows" about as well as any other Shelby that I have seen over the past 28 years. What my car may lack in concourse correctness, is more than made up for with its documented history of being the first production G.T. 500 built by Shelby American. My wife and I drove the car to a show this past weekend. It had a steady stream of admirers parading past it for the entire day. The show was at a Ford dealership and the owners parked a new 2007 G.T. 500 next to my car. The "first" one and a "new" one side by side. It made for a great display. We took three awards at this show: 1st Place in the Shelby club class, People's Choice, and The President's Award/Overall Show Stopper as selected by the President of the Ford dealership. As I said, it is not perfect but it shows quite nicely and to top things off; I had the pleasure of driving it home.

    I appreciate the true "competition show cars" and what their owners have done to get their cars to that level. However, in my book that does not give these people any right to criticize and rip on cars owned by other people. Appreciate the cars for what they are now and be happy that they are still around to be enjoyed.

    Thanks,
    Eric
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2007
  18. markboss

    markboss Well-Known Member

    Age:
    67
    Posts:
    134
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
  19. ELJ1st500

    ELJ1st500 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    61
    Posts:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Location:
    Colorado
    MarkBoss,

    Well then, it seems that your car and the car in the NVSAAC photo were done differently than my car. As I stated before, the current positioning of the junction block in my car is just as it is in the photos taken 40 years ago when my car was road tested by Road and Track and Sports Car Graphic.

    Based on these vintage/period photos, the positioning/orientation of the junction block in my car is correct.... end of story.

    Eric
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2007
  20. markboss

    markboss Well-Known Member

    Age:
    67
    Posts:
    134
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    No problem...
    One thing about these cars is that no two are alike....especially depending on what time of year they were made....

    I have a copy of that road and track here somewhere!!
     

Share This Page