Browne Woods & George Announces That Disney's Hollywood Pictures Has Entered into a New ``Quitclaim'' with Halicki Triggering a New Lawsuit against Carroll Shelby & Unique Performance Oct 23, 2007 4:25 PM CDT LOS ANGELES-- (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Denice Halicki, The Original Gone in 60 Seconds, LLC and Halicki Films, LLC filed a new lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District armed with a new ³Quitclaim Agreement² and famed trial attorney Allan Browne of Browne Woods & George LLP. Mr. Browne filed the action on behalf of Halicki and her companies against Carroll Shelby, Carroll Shelby International, Inc., Carroll Shelby Licensing, Inc., Carroll Shelby Engineering, Inc., Carroll Shelby Motors, Inc., Carroll Shelby Distribution International, Inc., Carroll Hall Shelby Trust, Unique Performance, Unique Motorcars, Inc., and Sanderson Sales & Marketing for copyright and trademark infringement, Case No. CV-07-06859 SVW. Hollywood Pictures Company (HPC), a subsidiary of the Walt Disney Company and producer of the 2000 remake of ³Gone in 60 Seconds,² entered into the Quitclaim Agreement with Halicki to clear up and forever set the record straight over Halicki¹s rights to the starring character ³Eleanor² from the movie ³Gone in 60 Seconds,² which also featured Nicolas Cage and Angelina Jolie. The Quitclaim Agreement absolutely confirms that Halicki, and not any other person or entity, owns the right, title and interest in and to all merchandising for ³Eleanor,² the instantly-recognizable, and iconic ³souped up² 1967 Fastback Ford Mustang, which is the ³signature² of the movie ³Gone in 60 Seconds² 2000 (www.gonein60seconds.com). The complaint alleges that, without the authority, consent or knowledge of Halicki, the defendants, led by Carroll Shelby, entered into an improper and malicious scheme and conspiracy to manufacture, market and sell ³knock offs² of ³Eleanor² to the public, billing the car as authentic ³Eleanors² from ³Gone in 60 Seconds.² In doing so, the complaint alleges that the defendants knowingly and deliberately sought to capitalize on and exploit ³Eleanor¹s² fame from the movie, even though the defendants had no association with, participation in, or connection with the creation or development of the movie or ³Eleanor.² Indeed, the movie and ³Eleanor² are the brainchild of Halicki¹s late husband, H.B. ³Toby² Halicki, known to all in the movie and automobile circles as ³The Car Crash King.² The complaint further alleges that, despite their lack of any right or interest in the character of ³Eleanor² or the movie, the defendants, in particular Carroll Shelby, sought to mislead the public into thinking that they had created ³Eleanor,² they owned a right to ³Eleanor² and that they had the permission and authority of Halicki to produce and sell the ³knock off² vehicles. The complaint alleges that Shelby went so far as to falsely claim that he ³shares the rights with Disney for the Eleanor name.² Moreover, even though the defendants knew that Halicki owned the rights to ³Eleanor² and ³Gone in 60 Seconds,² the defendants intentionally took no action to obtain a license from Halicki to merchandise the cars. Instead, as alleged in the complaint, Steve Sanderson, the principal of defendant Sanderson Sales & Marketing, met with defendant Carroll Shelby and officers of defendant Shelby companies, including Neil Cummings and John Luft, and Douglas Hasty, Chris Layne and Richard Kearby, the founders of the Unique defendants to discuss obtaining permission from Halicki and HPC to produce the ³Eleanor² cars. According to Sanderson, when asked directly about contacting Halicki and HPC, Carroll Shelby reportedly replied, ³If they sue me, I¹ll sue them right back.² Browne Woods & George LLP Allan Browne, Esq. 310-274-7100 abrowne@bwgfirm.com www.brownewoods.com
Re: Latest law suit against Shelby The last article I read about this stated that it had gone to court and Carroll Shelby WON. I guess that just goes to show you that, as long as there are Attorneys, it's never over. On another Law Suite Matter: Does anyone have an "Up Date" on what Ford Motor Company is doing with their Law Suites against Businesses with the Names Mustang, Stang and Pony in their Titles? I decided to go ahead and change the name of my Company to avoid all the Legal Hassels. David.
If you have a response to this question, please post it in the appropriate thread. Thank you, Randall Also, here are links to two related threads: Federal Judge Dismisses Lawsuit against Shelby and Unique Performance Farmers Branch link in battle over 'Eleanor' name
I am going to go out on a limb here and say that Halicki probably is making a knee jerk reaction to a "Unique" situation. at this point who would want to fess up to being involved with Eleanor Mustang production?? I do not know if it happened, but Shelby licensing had stated they were pulling their rights to use the name SHELBY on these vehicles. which just might create an Orphan by the name of "ELEANOR"! so she will rush in and pick up her Baby......! Opportunity. one mans Hell creates another Man's Heaven
this was filed a week before Unique had it's assets seized. which means it was in process well before that.
Here is the actual Complaint by Halicki. Just the facts.... http://www.aolcdn.com/tmz_documents/1025_nick_cage_wm.pdf