Join Shelby Forums Today

For the hardcore ONLY - GT500J

Discussion in '1965-1970 Shelby Mustang GT350 & GT500' started by Coralsnake, Nov 2, 2007.

  1. Coralsnake

    Coralsnake Well-Known Member

    Age:
    60
    Posts:
    1,048
    Likes Received:
    16
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Location:
    The Northcoast
    At some point during the 1968 production year, Shelby had the intention of building a car that was to be striped as a "GT500J".

    Does anyone know what this designation was for?

    Please no guesses, unless you know....



    :guitar: :guitar:
     
  2. 67GT500#2100

    67GT500#2100 Shelby Forums Pit Crew

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    1,398
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Location:
    Near Michigan International Speedway
    Re: For the hardcore ONLY

    This is not a guess but I don't know if it is true or not. I was attending SAAC 15 and having a 67 I was parked with the other 67's and 68's. A guy with a KR was parked next to me and we started talking. I remember him saying that Ford/Shelby had found out about 2 new models GM was planning for 69. One being a new 396 powered Camaro called the King of the Road and a 455 powered GTO called the Judge. Talk started of grabbing these names first and eventually they settled on GT500KR as the Camaro was a direct competitor as a pony car. The GT500J with J for Judge idea was scraped and the rest is history.

    I may never know if this guys story was true or not but it is an interesting one at least.
     
  3. vernonestes

    vernonestes Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,453
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    Re: For the hardcore ONLY

    Just one minor correction....
    The KR that Chevy was to produce was a Corvette.
    Heres the man himself telling the story....
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdI_BO2bcBY
    I assume most on this forum have seen this vid.....
    Sorry to switch the subject from the "J", for which i have no clue and wont be giving any guesses, just thought this ought to be clarified.
    Best Regards,
    Vern
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 26, 2007
  4. 67GT500#2100

    67GT500#2100 Shelby Forums Pit Crew

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    1,398
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Location:
    Near Michigan International Speedway
    Re: For the hardcore ONLY

    Thanks for the correction Vern, this was told to me 17 years ago and I may have gotten some of the details wrong. I just told the story the way I remembered it.
     
  5. 67GT500#2100

    67GT500#2100 Shelby Forums Pit Crew

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    1,398
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Location:
    Near Michigan International Speedway
  6. vernonestes

    vernonestes Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,453
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    Re: For the hardcore ONLY

    This throws me through a loop considering that the mustang's main rival was the upandcoming camaro and shelby's big rival on home turf was the corvette.

    Does anyone out there have any solid proof for either case here?

    Shelby is getting older and we have to allow him to slip up every once in a while. After all...shelby wasnt the hands on guy that people make him out to be, not to steal any of the big man's thunder, he admits that he surrounded himself with great people such as Remington, Miles, Spencer, Cantwell, Dowd, Gurney, Bondurant just to name a very select few. i always thought it was the corvette even before i saw the video....that is just the way it had been told to me.
    We might not ever know for sure as the GM car obviously never happened...however, shelby said in the vid that they made brochures for the car........anyone ever seen one?

    Best Regards,
    Vern
     
  7. Coralsnake

    Coralsnake Well-Known Member

    Age:
    60
    Posts:
    1,048
    Likes Received:
    16
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Location:
    The Northcoast
    Re: For the hardcore ONLY

    I had not heard the "Judge" story, but it makes sense on some levels. I know the J model was planned and I guessed it was a replacement for the GT500 PI. I have seen the drawings for the stripe kits and it was planned as mid-year introduction....
     
  8. rshelby

    rshelby ShelbyForums Admin Staff Member

    Posts:
    2,531
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2004
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Pete, I have an update, although not a good one. I am very sorry for not getting back to you earlier but have been extremely busy in the last two weeks. I showed Carroll the drawings for the stripe kit on Friday, Nov. 9th. He looked them over for a few minutes and said that he could not remember what they were for. He then asked Don McCain if he remembered. Don thought that it was a "spacing exercise" for the stripes but said that he did not remember either. Don has known Carroll for over 50 years and worked with him on and off throughout that time. He currently runs Carroll Shelby Enterprises. (engines)

    Sorry I did not get a more conclusive response. The mystery continues...
    Randall
     
  9. Coralsnake

    Coralsnake Well-Known Member

    Age:
    60
    Posts:
    1,048
    Likes Received:
    16
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Location:
    The Northcoast
    Thanks for checking. I like the "judge" story. :guitar:

    It seems odd if it were just an exercise they would assign a part number? It is possible...

    I really appreciate it. :cigar:
     
  10. rshelby

    rshelby ShelbyForums Admin Staff Member

    Posts:
    2,531
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2004
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    No problem.

    I think that the "spacing exercise" was a total guess. Carroll did examine the drawing for a while though and just could not come up with an answer. He was puzzled.
    Randall
     
  11. Coralsnake

    Coralsnake Well-Known Member

    Age:
    60
    Posts:
    1,048
    Likes Received:
    16
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Location:
    The Northcoast
    Well, we something in common! I am puzzled too. The mid-year date is a clue. Something was planned and never executed. I have also found evidence of Hertz striping and supercharger striping, but we don't see those either....

    :guns:
     
  12. crzy4shelbys

    crzy4shelbys Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    202
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Location:
    Trabuco Canyon, CA, USA
    I don't claim to be an expert by any means, but relative to the KR portion of the discussion, I had read about 15-20 years ago that the Chevy project was actually going to be the "Road King" and it was slated as a Camaro project. Coralsnake would know much better than I, but it's my understanding that by the 1968 Shelby models, Ford was making the decisions, not CS. It seems to me that Ford saw the Camaro as a threat to the Mustang, for which the Shelby models were intended to boost sales. I don't think the Corvette and the Mustang were seen as directly competing markets by the Ford execs. Additionally, CS's rivalry with Corvette was probably limited to the C2's ('63-'67).

    Unfortunately, I don't know of any stories revolving around the "J" designation, but I like the Judge theory.

    Josh
     
  13. vernonestes

    vernonestes Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,453
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    Although ford higherups probly didnt see a "normal" stang as being a main competitor of the corvette, whether they intended it or not, the shelby gts were direct competitors of the corvette.
    How many vintage magazine articles are around which feature the shelbys vs the corvette 427s....ive seen more than a few.

    Im not discrediting the camaro theory as it probly holds more water than the corvette theory, as i said....this was only how it was told to me...and by Carroll Shelby himself.

    Best Regards,
    Vern
     

Share This Page