Join Shelby Forums Today

1966 GT350 Parts

Discussion in '1965-1970 Shelby Mustang GT350 & GT500' started by danielf, Jul 15, 2009.

  1. danielf

    danielf Member

    Posts:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Location:
    Fort Mohave, Arizona
    Hello all, new to the site and wanting to convert my '66 Fastback into a GT350. I had a couple of questions and was hoping you all could answer them for me.

    1) Who makes the best quality hood. I see alot of hoods that mid way down where the edges meet the fender it looks like the hood is "bowed" up a little. Like its too long and its just stuffed on there and it bows up. I really hate that and think it looks ugly. Would having a hood with a full steel frame underneath fix that or is it something else?

    2) As on the '65-66 Mustang 2+2, the '65 GT350 came with the quarter vents in place. On the '66 models they did not? Were all '66 GT350s equiped with the quarter windows and not the vents. I hate to loose the vents (to me thats what makes these cars) but am willing to remove them to make it as acurate as possible.

    3) What are the correct wheels for the car. Ive seen the 10 spoke wheels but also came across a vintage Shelby ad in an old magazine that said that for the best wheel he chose the Magnum 500. The car in the background was a white GT350. I thought only the Hertz models got those wheels. I would perfer to have them but again, for period correctness, ill deal with the 10 spokes.

    4) Did the exhuast still come out under the side in '66 like on the '65 models or was it out the back like on the '67,68 and so on models? If it came out the back, what type of system was it. The old "arvinode" system or his own type?

    Also, not having anything to do with the above, but i was wondering how the side rocker molding comes off. Are there a bunch of rivets holding it one or is it just glued on like todays moldings? I hate to have to fill a thousand little holes or grind down rivets. And if anyone can give me a ballpark figure on what it costs to repaint the car with stripes ide sure appreciate it. There are only a few body shops in town, of which i trust none of them, and am looking at having to take the car out of town when the time comes. Im just trying to get a IDEA of what i can expect. Doesnt need to be a $10k show car paint job, just a good oem type job. I plan on driving the car around alot, not parking it at shows.

    Thank you in advance for any info, it will be GREATLY appreciated.
     
  2. zrayr

    zrayr Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    446
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2005
    Location:
    TX
    1) I think Jim Cowls still makes hoods w/ the scoop. He made one for me several years ago (fiberglass over the steel frame). It was fabulous.

    http://www.shelbyparts.com/index.html

    2) all '66's had the quarter window. If you are wanting to keep the vents why not just make a '65 looking clone ?

    3) Wheels were either painted magnum 500's or the chrome ones that you see today, or the 10 spoke variety. None of these are more correct than the other. Of course the '65 had different wheels than the '66

    4) exhaust came out the back. It was stock K code except for the headers. Don't think there any '66's with the arvinode system, anyone know for sure ? I think those were only on the '65 K codes

    5) I think you have to pay $5,000 for an acceptable paint job. If you can do some of the prep work yourself you might be able to save some serious $$$.

    Z. Ray
     
  3. A-Snake

    A-Snake Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    danielf,

    Your car and your money so do what makes you feel good. :D

    But, may I suggest that you spend the time/money (most likely less) to restore your car back to its original condition. There are so many fastbacks that have been made into look-a-like Shelby's that nicely done regular fastbacks are becoming scarce, and more appealing.
    Done well, you may even see a better return when you decide to sell. Besides, do you really want to go thru the "Is that a real Shelby?" ….just a thought ;)
     
  4. danielf

    danielf Member

    Posts:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Location:
    Fort Mohave, Arizona
    The reason i dont want to go with the '65 GT350 is because to make it period correct, i would have to remove and replace the rear seat with a fiberglass panel, use crager wheels, (which i dont like) and the car can only be White with Blue Stripes. I understand that was the only color available for the '65 Shelbys. It would be cheaper for me to do red because my car is already red, and i wouldnt have to pay extra to strip it all down and do door jams and underhood, truck etc.
     
  5. tommyleea

    tommyleea Well-Known Member

    Age:
    70
    Posts:
    129
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Check out Brians thread on this forum. Backyard restoration. I am sure you can get tons of information reading his project progress.
     
  6. danielf

    danielf Member

    Posts:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Location:
    Fort Mohave, Arizona
    Well that's just it, it IS original condition aside from a few extra parts in my sig below. Unrestored, documented 48,780 miles. I was just thinking as i need to replace stuff or restore the car, just swap it out for all the Shelby parts. I guess you right, I'm already tired of having to correct people for calling it a '67/68 :doh: or asking if i want to sell it, which will be never. I'll sell my first born before i sell this car! :lol:

    Yeah here's a picture of what she looks like now...
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 5, 2009
  7. zrayr

    zrayr Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    446
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2005
    Location:
    TX
    I like it the way it is. simple & pure lines. Unadorned by extraneous GT stripes, extra emblems, etc.

    Z. Ray
     
  8. Texas Swede

    Texas Swede Well-Known Member

    Age:
    76
    Posts:
    520
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Location:
    Richardson, Texas
    I agree with Z. Ray, leave it the way it is. Looks beautiful.
    Texas Swede
     
  9. danielf

    danielf Member

    Posts:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Location:
    Fort Mohave, Arizona
    Thanks guys. Yeah its an original C-code, c4, 2.80 open diff car. No Gt options, standard interior but does have an original rally pack gauge set.
     
  10. SFM6S087

    SFM6S087 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    113
    Likes Received:
    5
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    Location:
    Pasadena, Texas (outside of Houston)
    It's your car so by all means do whatever makes you happy. But I agree with the people saying it looks GREAT the way it is! And I would think it might get tiring answering questions about "Is it real?" Better to have a real '66 Mustang that you can be proud of than a clone Shelby that you have to constantly explain. Just my opinion. Now go do what you want and come back with more pictures when you get it just the way YOU like it.

    Steve
     
  11. danielf

    danielf Member

    Posts:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Location:
    Fort Mohave, Arizona
    Well thanks guys. You sure are alot more pleasant/respectful then some of the other forums out there. As you see it now is how i plan to keep it if i dont give it the clone job. Well, maybe a set of styled steel wheels. I have a problem with those hubcaps flying off all the time. Replacing them is getting old, annoying and expensive. Ill post some more pics later once i get her repainted and rechromed.

    Btw, do you guys have a "tech section" where i can ask questions without having to be "Shelby" specific?
     
  12. 56ace

    56ace Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    163
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Daniel,
    Great looking car and I agree with others that maybe you should consider keeping it original or at least original looking. As for the wheels, Torque Thrust Ds are a good looking vintage wheels and can be found on Craigslist for <$200 for a set, and some times around $100. As for the tech questions, there are many very knowlegable people here that are very willing to share so I wouldn't hesitate to ask questions.
    Jay
     
  13. danielf

    danielf Member

    Posts:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Location:
    Fort Mohave, Arizona
    Yeah thanks again. I guess my only question would be about the choosing the right cam shaft. I know that the K-code motors used in the GT350 had factory solid lifter cams. I would like to get that nostalgic sound and as much performance as possible (low to mid range power) without having too big of a lope or being too shakey. I have Power steering and A/C so i would need a cam that would still work with both factory options. I just dont know what is the better brand i dont understand how to read specs on cams. I just look to see which one has what lope.
     
  14. zrayr

    zrayr Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    446
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2005
    Location:
    TX
    Comp Cams have two cams that you might like, they are very similar to the Hi-Po cam used ion the K- code cars & the '65 to '67 GT-350's Or they might be exactly the same, you would have to call Comp Cams & ask them :

    Factory Muscle, C30ZS
    Todays Version of Yesterday's Muscle Car Camshaft
    http://www.compcams.com/Cam_Specs/CamDetails.aspx?csid=823&sb=2

    Nostalgia Plus™, N+271S
    Outstanding Power & Modern Tight Lash
    http://www.compcams.com/Cam_Specs/CamDetails.aspx?csid=824&sb=2

    Also you might ask on the HiPo Mustang web site. There is a member that has had the original HiPo cam reproduced & he might have some some sale.
    I don't know, but what he has might be the same as the Comp Cam Factory Muscle, C30ZS .

    Z. Ray
     
  15. A-Snake

    A-Snake Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    There are many more differences then just a solid lifter cam in a 289 HiPo. Rods, heads etc. etc. Even the automatics used in the Hertz GT350's were different. Just adding a solid lifter cam may cause more "problems" than it's worth.

    Just a thought...
     
  16. zrayr

    zrayr Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    446
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2005
    Location:
    TX
    if you do decide to go to a solid lifter cam, I would suggest roller rocker arms also. Most of them have a poly-lock adjusting nut which greatly extends the time between adjustments. I'm using the roller rocker arms, and my valve clearance hasn't changed in 14,000 miles. Of course, there's always complications, in this case going to roller rocker arms; usually that requires that you have a taller valve cover than stock, or add a spacer.

    Have fun whatever you decide. Modifying a car, or just restoring it to it's former glory, is a great adventure.


    Z. Ray
     
  17. danielf

    danielf Member

    Posts:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Location:
    Fort Mohave, Arizona
    Well thats just it, i will NOT be using a solid lifter cam. My heads have pressed in studs where as the K-code heads use a screw in stud to keep them from pulling out because of the cam. I want to run a direct replacement hydrolic cam that will give more power but still have that sound. I understand that the K code cam was more of a quicker chattier lope then a lazy, long duration lope like that o a high hp drag car. Like i said i dont know how to read cam specs so i dont know which one will give me which sound. Im trying to stay away from anything TOO lopey for i dont want this thing to sound like its got a 500hp race motor in it, dont want it to sound like its got more then it really does.You know? But ill give them a call i guess. Thanks guys!:)
     
  18. zrayr

    zrayr Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    446
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2005
    Location:
    TX
  19. danielf

    danielf Member

    Posts:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Location:
    Fort Mohave, Arizona
    Yeah Z, Exactly. Haha i was just looking at that before i jumped back on the board here. How funny. Wow, if i do that and get those POWERHEADS...oh man this thing should COOK!!! Oh, i cant wait!

    Btw, you have any trouble getting in at the HIPO forums? I signed up and when it told me to checkmy email there wasnt anyting there. Still isnt and vintage mustang forum wont take anyone with yahoo or hotmail, and i have both. So i guess im heck out of luck on that one.
     
  20. 67GT500#2100

    67GT500#2100 Shelby Forums Pit Crew

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    1,398
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Location:
    Near Michigan International Speedway
    I also have a 66 fastback and know a little about them.:) Although 66 was the highest production single year for the Mustangs ever, (If you split 64.5's and 65's) 66 is the year with the smallest fastback production in both shear numbers and as a percentage of total production. Twice as many 65 fastback were made than 66's. It is your car do what ever makes you happy, I personally have heavily modified my 66 but, the original drivetrain in packed away and every other mod could be undone if I desire sometime down the road. Good luck and if you chose to build the clone keep giving us updates on any progress being made.B)
     

Share This Page