Join Shelby Forums Today

1968 GT500 (nonKR) Transmission Tail Shaft Housing; Al or Fe?

Discussion in '1965-1970 Shelby Mustang GT350 & GT500' started by Engineer, Oct 9, 2005.

  1. Engineer

    Engineer Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    59
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Location:
    Frankenmuth, Michigan (100 miles North of Detroit
    Looking for some input from the owners of 1968 GT500s (nonKR) equipped with Automatic transmissions (C6). I have a 1968 GT500 that is in the process of restoration. She is disassembled to the point that I know the significant components on the Shelby are numbers matching with the exception of the carburetor (a 1969 warranty or recall replacement) and the transmission (a remanufactured replacement from the 1970s/early 1980s). I would like to replace the transmission with a rebuilt C6 using date code correct castings. My question: Is the tail shaft housing on the GT500 (nonKR) aluminum or cast iron? I have had the opportunity to crawl under two "original" GT500s and the tail shaft housing was aluminum. According to the reference books I have the tail shaft housing should be cast iron. I have found a concours restored GT500KR on Legendary Motors website and the tail shaft housing is clearly cast iron. Were GT500 tail shaft housings aluminum or "mixed" aluminum and cast iron? Were all GT500KR tail shaft housings cast iron? Opinions and evidence (as in whats under your 500) appreciated. Rick
     
  2. S8MS-01904

    S8MS-01904 Well-Known Member

    Age:
    63
    Posts:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2005
    Location:
    The Greater Republic of Carmel, Indiana
    Mine's aluminum and I would most guarantee (99%) that the GT500's were all alumiunum tail shafts and the "KR's" were cast iron.

    The engine plants and transmission plants built this stuff ahead months at a time.

    Also, the 1968 model year UAW FORD strike was in the winter of 1967 if I remember correctly, so the mismatch (KR with aluminum vs %00 with cast iron) is unlikely.

    Tom
     
  3. Engineer

    Engineer Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    59
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Location:
    Frankenmuth, Michigan (100 miles North of Detroit
    Tom, Thank you for the response. Your 500 makes the third I know of with and aluminum tail shaft housing so I believe you are right that 500's were aluminum. Again, thanks! Rick
     
  4. Seaweed

    Seaweed Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    181
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    I just cked mine, 68 G.T. 500 borne 1- 11-68 alum.--S.
     
  5. Engineer

    Engineer Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    59
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    Location:
    Frankenmuth, Michigan (100 miles North of Detroit
    Seaweed, Thank you for looking and the response. Concensus from this forum, a couple other forums, and all references contected is that GT500 (non-KR) tail shaft housings were aluminum. Already found my date code correct C6 with aluminum tail shaft housing for rebuild. Thanks again. Rick
     
  6. TLEA

    TLEA Well-Known Member

    Age:
    67
    Posts:
    887
    Likes Received:
    11
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Location:
    Warwick, Rhode Island
    I know of several non KR's with original C6's and both are aluminum.
    Tim
     

Share This Page