Join Shelby Forums Today

1x4v vs 2x4v, 600 vs 450

Discussion in '1965-1970 Shelby Mustang GT350 & GT500' started by firestanggt, Oct 10, 2007.

  1. firestanggt

    firestanggt Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    74
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2006
    Location:
    Maine
    Ok, so I know I ask alot of questions, but i think this one should spark some good debate/discussion.
    I have the original single 4 intake for the 68 428CJ but I also have access to a 427 low riser 2x4 C3AE-J intake.
    I'd like to go with the dual quad so it atleast looks more original since it's going in a 67 GT500.
    I'd like to hear any feedback on one setup vs the other on things like performance and reliability issues. I know some Holleys can be a real pain to tune.
    Also, any opinions on 2 450's vs 2 600s? I read somewhere that the 450s were a better choice for the dual quad.
    The engine will be mostly stock with probably just a little more can then stock.
    Lastly, does anyone know of a good source to find the procedure to straightening out the FE's oiling problems? I know there are a couple oil gallys on the crank that need to be chamfered, but I'd like to find an article or something that gives some details on how to fix all the oiling issues.

    thanks again guys
     

    Attached Files:

  2. tesgt350

    tesgt350 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,093
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Location:
    I am in my own little World
    Well.....with the few FE 428PI & 428CJ Motors that I have been involved with either as daily drivers or as daily drivers/weekend racing, I know there is one or two oil hole up top (block) that can be blocked off to increase the oil presure for the lower half of the block. The Cam, Lifters and Valves still get all the needed oil. it has been almost 20 years since I built one that I just cant remember which hole/holes to plug. Maybe someone on here can help with that.
    David.
     
  3. Al Marsden

    Al Marsden Member

    Posts:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Our 67 500 has the original carbs. Pony Carburetors restored ours about four years ago. The secret is in the linkage. It took some time but by adjusting periodicaly they are great now. Having a good restoration is really the way to go. Good luck -- hang on to your pocket but they are like new when done!!
    Al
     
  4. John76

    John76 Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    134
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Location:
    Socal
    I have an opinion...I have a 427 SO in my 67 GT500 with the dual quads. i am in the process of rebuilding the engine and replacing the heads with a set worked aluminum heads and an aluminum single carb intake. My reason for changing the dual quads intake...i was never happy with the performance. Also when i pulled my engine for rebuild i found 2 much gas had been leaking through and had washed out the rings. I also had another problem...i was burning oil much faster then i anticipated. The problem was the gas had been collecting in the oil pan...mixing with the oil and burning a lot faster then it should have.
    So in a desire to go fast and reliability i have boxed up my dual quads and intake and will run a single carb setup.
    I knew this was the right move when i was looking at Charley's Super Snake...no dual quads. Charley's 67 GT500 was the only 67 to get a Shelby installed 427. The motor came out of GT40 and was ready to race...and no dual quads. If it was such a great setup why didn't Shelby run it on the Super Snake? I think if you are going for looks and originality then go with the dual quads...if you are thinking performance a single carb setup is the way to go.
    But like i said this is my opinion...
     
  5. highland green

    highland green Well-Known Member

    Age:
    69
    Posts:
    71
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 1, 2005
    I agree with both of the above threads, the 600s rebuilt by pony carbs seem to be the answer,I would use a medium riser or blue thunder intake, the low riser just doesnt look right. If your after performance with reliability go with a single four barrel, thats what was done with a lot of them back in the day.
     
  6. DJR

    DJR Well-Known Member

    Age:
    57
    Posts:
    205
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2004
    Location:
    Ontario,Canada
    I had Tri Power on my CJ years ago. As mentioned before, the trick is in the linkage set up. If you got it right, it runs good. If not, pain in the butt. Running a single four with the correct setup is much more driveable. Maybe not as impressive when you pop the hood thou.
     

Share This Page