Thats the way it is for the parts end of it, Im not sure theres a line in the sand over the complete car thing. Maybe call Amy Bolylan new Pres of SA and see what she has to say >From: jonlee@wt.net >To: Shelby List <shelbymustang@carmemories.com> >Subject: Re: Clones Illegal to use SHELBY name >Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:15:40 -0600 > >Interesting. > >So...with this logo principle in mind, you could build a Shelby clone and >just not use the "Shelby" logos and still get away with the clone right? Or >does this mean that Shelby will have no interest >until they see how big the Shelby stuff will be. > >Im no expert but my gut feeling tells me that as the Shelby cars bring in >more bucks, what we thought was not an infringement issue might become one. > > >02 cents > >jon > > > > Quoting James G Cowles <shelbyparts@msn.com>: > >- Ford and Shelby Licensing agreements are only for those parts that have a >- logo involved. If the logo is not on the part they have no interest. All >- the decals weve had made involving the logo with Ford have been approved >by >- the Ford licensing agreement >- >- >- >From: jonlee@wt.net >- >To: Shelby List <shelbymustang@carmemories.com> >- >Subject: Re: Clones Illegal to use SHELBY name >- >Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:46:20 -0600 >- > >- >In other words...I agree with Jim >- > >- >You know...thinking about this sounds much like Napster and the whole >- >copying issue where the record industry tried to stop the web companies >- >from allowing unlicensed music to be copied AND going >- >after the people making the copies or end users. In all, Jim's point of >- >going after the manufacturer would have a stronger impact than going >after >- >people individually. >- > >- >Which leads to another issue. I noticed that double hump Resonators, 69 >- >Shelby chrome fender/hood lip moldings and other stuff are being >- >reproduced. I wonder if they are licensed properly by Ford or >- >Shelby. >- > >- > >- >just my .02 cents >- > >- > >- >jon >- > >- > >- > >- > >- >Quoting jonlee@wt.net: >- > >- >- >- >- sounds logical to me! >- >- >- >- jon >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- Quoting RSANTER@aol.com: >- >- >- >- - >- >- - I must say I agree with every word >- >- - >- >- - bob >- >- - >- >- - >- >- - >- >- - In a message dated 12/12/2005 12:06:41 PM Pacific Standard Time, >- >- - ecj@peoplepc.com writes: >- >- - >- >- - There is a big difference between a company selling kit car Cobras >and >- >a >- >- - single person selling a "clone" of a 1965-1970 Shelby Mustang that >they >- >personally >- >- - own. If someone creates a clone 1970 Boss 302 Mustang should Ford go >- >after >- >- - them for sell it too? What's next, Shelby Enterprises stopping >people >- >from >- >- - painting LeMans stripes on any 1965-2005 Mustang? I think it is >E-Bay >- >that needs to >- >- - set some standards. I think that all kit car Cobras need to be in >the >- >"Kit >- >- - Car" section of E-Bay, that real Shelby Mustangs and Shelby Cobras >be >- >in the >- >- - "Shelby" section of E-Bay and that all other Mustangs cars be listed >as >- >Ford >- >- - Mustangs. >- >- - >- >- - I think we need to get the real story behind all this. If Shelby >- >Enterprises >- >- - doesn't want people making and selling Shelby Mustang clones then >they >- >need to >- >- - stop the people selling the parts that make them. >- >- - >- >- - I don't think we are getting the whole story here. >- >- - >- >- - Jim Seisser >- >- - >- >- - >- >- - >- >- - >- >- - >- >- - >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- >- > >- > >- > >- >- _________________________________________________________________ >- Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's >FREE! >- http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ >- >- > > > _________________________________________________________________ Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
