Re: Strange Body VIN Stamping on 1970 Mustang on E-Bay

Thanks Bob,....... learn somthing everyday ...............

OF course we don't want to evaluate cars based on "anything was possible' that just opens the door for all kinds of things.

As for another post ... do/did have a 69 mess-up car 69 coupe, big block shock towers, staggered rear shocks, no front apron VIN's (except for some home made ones)

Was delivered as a 351 W 4V, automatic, AC, bench seat car. Order/need must have changed when this car was half way through the line for some reason.... Then there is that R code 67 fastback I ran across

But of course very few New Jersey cars make it out here

Jeff S

-----Original Message-----
From: Bobby Crumpley <bcrumpley@prodigy.net>
Sent: Mar 9, 2005 5:03 AM
To: ecj <ecj@peoplepc.com>, shelbymustang@carmemories.com
Subject: Re: Strange Body VIN Stamping on 1970 Mustang on E-Bay

Jim,

We've discussed this a bit on the Boss 302 forum. It seems that a lot of the '70 cars were stamped with partial VINs. Most of the Dearborn cars with partial stampings seem to start with "0"s, while the Metuchen cars started with "1" or "4". The Dearborn built Boss 302 that I recently sold to a fellow list member has 0F****** on the inner fenders, with the 6 digit sequential number matching the dash tag. The number on the block is the same partial number. I guess something changed for the '70 model year with the numbers, and I bet someone on the list can explain.

Bobby

 

hey guys....
Is there a Boss 302 forum to link into?
Please send web address.
Thanks,
Dan


----- Original Message -----
From: <speegle@pipeline.com>
To: "Bobby Crumpley" <bcrumpley@prodigy.net>; "ecj" <ecj@peoplepc.com>;
<shelbymustang@carmemories.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Strange Body VIN Stamping on 1970 Mustang on E-Bay


> Thanks Bob,....... learn somthing everyday ...............
>
> OF course we don't want to evaluate cars based on "anything was possible'
that just opens the door for all kinds of things.
>
> As for another post ... do/did have a 69 mess-up car 69 coupe, big block
shock towers, staggered rear shocks, no front apron VIN's (except for some
home made ones)
>
> Was delivered as a 351 W 4V, automatic, AC, bench seat car. Order/need
must have changed when this car was half way through the line for some
reason.... Then there is that R code 67 fastback I ran across
>
> But of course very few New Jersey cars make it out here
>
> Jeff S
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bobby Crumpley <bcrumpley@prodigy.net>
> Sent: Mar 9, 2005 5:03 AM
> To: ecj <ecj@peoplepc.com>, shelbymustang@carmemories.com
> Subject: Re: Strange Body VIN Stamping on 1970 Mustang on E-Bay
>
> Jim,
>
> We've discussed this a bit on the Boss 302 forum. It seems that a lot of
the '70 cars were stamped with partial VINs. Most of the Dearborn cars with
partial stampings seem to start with "0"s, while the Metuchen cars started
with "1" or "4". The Dearborn built Boss 302 that I recently sold to a
fellow list member has 0F****** on the inner fenders, with the 6 digit
sequential number matching the dash tag. The number on the block is the
same partial number. I guess something changed for the '70 model year with
the numbers, and I bet someone on the list can explain.
>
> Bobby
>
>
>

 

www.boss302.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Drury" <dan_drury@midamcorp.com>
To: <speegle@pipeline.com>; "Bobby Crumpley" <bcrumpley@prodigy.net>; "ecj"
<ecj@peoplepc.com>; <shelbymustang@carmemories.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: Strange Body VIN Stamping on 1970 Mustang on E-Bay


> hey guys....
> Is there a Boss 302 forum to link into?
> Please send web address.
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <speegle@pipeline.com>
> To: "Bobby Crumpley" <bcrumpley@prodigy.net>; "ecj" <ecj@peoplepc.com>;
> <shelbymustang@carmemories.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 12:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Strange Body VIN Stamping on 1970 Mustang on E-Bay
>
>
>> Thanks Bob,....... learn somthing everyday ...............
>>
>> OF course we don't want to evaluate cars based on "anything was possible'
> that just opens the door for all kinds of things.
>>
>> As for another post ... do/did have a 69 mess-up car 69 coupe, big block
> shock towers, staggered rear shocks, no front apron VIN's (except for some
> home made ones)
>>
>> Was delivered as a 351 W 4V, automatic, AC, bench seat car. Order/need
> must have changed when this car was half way through the line for some
> reason.... Then there is that R code 67 fastback I ran across
>>
>> But of course very few New Jersey cars make it out here
>>
>> Jeff S
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bobby Crumpley <bcrumpley@prodigy.net>
>> Sent: Mar 9, 2005 5:03 AM
>> To: ecj <ecj@peoplepc.com>, shelbymustang@carmemories.com
>> Subject: Re: Strange Body VIN Stamping on 1970 Mustang on E-Bay
>>
>> Jim,
>>
>> We've discussed this a bit on the Boss 302 forum. It seems that a lot of
> the '70 cars were stamped with partial VINs. Most of the Dearborn cars
> with
> partial stampings seem to start with "0"s, while the Metuchen cars started
> with "1" or "4". The Dearborn built Boss 302 that I recently sold to a
> fellow list member has 0F****** on the inner fenders, with the 6 digit
> sequential number matching the dash tag. The number on the block is the
> same partial number. I guess something changed for the '70 model year
> with
> the numbers, and I bet someone on the list can explain.
>>
>> Bobby
>>
>>
>>
>